Hi guys,
You may wish to check out my friend Mike’s blog on why influenza virus may either evolve towards increased virulence or decreased virulence.
http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2009/04/nonoptimal_virulence_and_avian_1.php
Vc
Hi guys,
You may wish to check out my friend Mike’s blog on why influenza virus may either evolve towards increased virulence or decreased virulence.
http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2009/04/nonoptimal_virulence_and_avian_1.php
Vc
The Airborne Metagenome in an Indoor Urban Environment
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0001862
All, please take this opportunity to read this and comment upon the science, either here on this blog or there, on the article itself! I’m sure the authors would appreciate your thoughts.
Gang,
A reminder that, by next Tuesday, you are to find an article on the evolution of virulence that addresses this question using “population thinking.” This means not the mechanisms that underlie one strain’s methods of being virulent, but rather why various alternatives exist, or how they interplay with variation among hosts, etc.
I look forward to your diverse findings on your blogs.
VC
Hi guys, a reminder for you to comment on the article of Greg Velicer’s that you chose to read. We’d all appreciate reading what you learned, what you think of the experiment, what more you’d like to know, any criticisms, etc.
Also, for today’s lecture on how one can find the underlying genetic mechanisms of selfishness and cooperation, here are some links on next-generation sequencing methods:
454 sequencing:
http://www.454.com/products-solutions/how-it-works/index.asp
Solexa sequencing:
http://www.illumina.com/pages.ilmn?ID=203
In realizing that the amount of data you have to analyze is substantial, and that the goals of the analysis are not totally clear, please:
1. Analyze your data and only the group to the right of you on the spreadsheet. If you’re last, also do the first group.
2. The experimental design involved two genotype entrants of your choice. You streaked these out, and I picked two clones of each (these are experimental replicates). I then inoculated three wells of each of these clones (these are technical replicates). First, calculate the AUC for each of these twelve wells. Next, to find out which clone of yours is a superior performer, take the mean of each of the three technical replicates, then take the average of the two experimental replicates for each genotype. This is your final AUC score, in units OD600/min.
3. Please post your results as well as your analysis of your spreadsheet neighbor on the right. Peer review will help us all avoid errors.
Hope this makes some sense.
Dear all,
As promised I have created a Google Docs spreadsheet in which you should all post your motility data. The link for this motility data is:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=ppblk1ndCOl3ovQ_PRem-Ow
The link for the growth curve data is here:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=ppblk1ndCOl3xZHQDX2Ijaw
and:
microbial-triathlon-2009 (XLS file)
Let me know (by commenting), if you have any questions or problems. I will add the growth curve data here soon and will also add more information about how to analyze these data shortly.
Instructions for the lab are here:
Enjoy, VC
Dear all,
Hope you’re enjoying this foray into the world of cheating in viruses (and soon, bacteria). To reiterate the assignment I sketched out in class today, please write on your blog (by next Tuesday) regarding this subject, answering the following questions:
1) How does Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) operate in viruses? Do you think it’s broadly relevant?
2) How might PD operate in other, non-human biological systems?
3) How might organisms escape from the dilemma? What would they have to do, or what sort of environmental change favor such an escape?
For more information, please visit Steffen’s past post on this topic:
and also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stag_hunt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_of_chicken
(the last game is analogous to the Snowdrift game, which I play after each large snowstorm with my neigbhors. Being a Midwesterner I am always a sucker…)
Hi guys,
I invite you all to visit and use the forum (see the linkon the top of the page) to post questions, concerns, or idaes, or to contribute knowledge for the benefit of your classmates. I will weigh in on questions as I can for everyone’s benefit.
Thanks,
Vaughn
Hi guys,
Please check out this article by Olivia Judson. It’s a fine example of experimental models being used to tackle big macroevolutionary problems:
Hi gang,
On Thursday I asked you to consider, on your blog, whether you believe the Travisano et al. “Experimental tests of the roles of adaptation, chance and history in evolution” paper addresses the same questions that Gould considered in studying the Burgess Shale.
In other words, can you use microbial experimental evolution, or any other tractable experimental system, to study macroevolutionary patterns? Do the same processes that influence bacterial populations evolving over 1,000′s of generations also influence Hallicugenia, or angiosperms, or dinosaurs, or wombats?
I look forward to your analysis.
IN ADDITION, please, by the end of this week (2/27), submit one of your contributions as your “best of” for grading. It can be a post, a comment on another blog, or a new post that synthesizes past information. Post this on your own blog, noting it as your “best of” choice.
A reminder that you are to have read the Travisano et al paper prior to today’s recitation. This afternoon will be entirely focused on this paper, which is one of the more important ones in the class.
Enjoy!
Vaughn